Michael Klishin
6704d454e4
Adhere to the existing coding style
2015-07-29 13:49:34 +03:00
Yury Pliner
d32e4bd59c
Named parameter version of the API #20
2015-06-25 00:14:27 +05:00
Michael Klishin
047215b188
Don't rely on implicit string coercion
2014-05-29 19:02:57 +04:00
Michael Klishin
be85d7d192
Merge pull request #17 from liddellj/master
...
Reply queue should not require acknowledgement in dotnet tutorial 6.
2013-10-23 20:17:58 -07:00
Keith Elder
3cd692d8b1
Reformatted and cleaned up
2013-08-24 22:18:31 -05:00
Jim Liddell
83f08f4198
Reply queue should not require acknowledgement.
...
Unless I have misunderstood something - I think the call to BasicConsume for the reply queue should pass 'true' instead of 'false' for the 'noAck' parameter - as the callback messages are not acknowledged. Otherwise this leaves unacknowledged messages in the queue.
2012-09-12 13:12:28 +02:00
Marek Majkowski
fba096fa9f
I don't thing 'response' variable is actually necessary
2011-08-15 15:46:17 +01:00
Marek Majkowski
0ee4fb89c4
Main goes to separate class, dropped 'using' in favor of something less idiomatic
2011-08-15 15:42:54 +01:00
Emile Joubert
f9b06ed777
More consistent rpc client, more wrapping
2011-06-13 15:46:58 +01:00
Emile Joubert
1183410dcc
C♯ tutorials 4-6
2011-06-09 15:28:28 +01:00
